11.1 Introduction

Federal Authority:

Social Security Act

§452(a)(11) - Duties of the Secretary

§454(9) and (20)  - State plan for child and spousal support

§466(f) and (d)  - Requirement of statutorily prescribed procedures to improve effectiveness of child support enforcement


Code of Federal Regulations

45CFR 302.36 Provisions of services in intergovernmental and intergovernmental IV-D cases

45CFR 303.7 Provision of services in intergovernmental IV-D cases

45CFR 305.63 Standards for determining substantial compliance with IV-D requirements

45CFR 308 Annual State Self Assessment Review and Report

State Authority:

Wyoming Statute

Wyo. Stat. § 20-139 et seq. - Uniform Intergovernmental Family Support Act


Wyoming Child Support Enforcement Rules

Chapter 4 - General Services

Chapter 16 - Services in Intergovernmental Cases

Policy Number: 11.1

Effective Date: July 1, 2015

Chapter

This chapter contains the following sections and sub-sections:

Note:  For purposes of the policy manual, “Agency” and “State” are interchangeable. Federal regulations use the general term “agency” to encompass State IV-D programs, Tribal programs, and foreign countries.   

Overview

In order to address these two major issues, the NCCUSL and the U.S. Commission on Intergovernmental Child Support drafted a “new” uniform state law to address the multiple order issue. In 1992, the Intergovernmental Child Support Commission recommended to Congress that Congress require each state enact the Uniform Intergovernmental Family Support Act (UIFSA).  Through one of the provisions of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996, Congress also required each state to pass UIFSA in order to receive federal funding.  

Intergovernmental cases are those that require action from more than one state’s IV-D agency because one parent resides in a different state from the other parent and the child.  The intergovernmental case processing framework for child support is a combination of federal and state law.  

Full Faith and Credit Child Support Order Act (FFCSOA)

In 1994, Congress enacted the Full Faith and Credit of Child Support Order Act (FFCSOA) and because at that time states were not required to pass UIFSA, Congress enacted FFCSOA to address the issue of multiple child support orders for the same custodial parent, non-custodial parent, and child.  FFCSOA requires enforcement of an order of another state’s tribunal and prohibits the modification or entry of a new order unless certain jurisdictional requirements are met.  Additionally, any payment of support due based upon a support order and unpaid after 30 days is considered a judgment by operation of law and is entitled to full, faith and credit (See 9.10 Enforcement – Judgments).

Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA)

The main premise of UIFSA is “one order.”  UIFSA provides strict rules and guidelines to resolve the multitude of issues associated with multiple orders for the same family unit from within one state or from multiple states.  Briefly, UIFSA:

Two of the main concepts of UIFSA are controlling order and continuing exclusive jurisdiction (CEJ).

Controlling Order

When a support order is entered, it is considered the controlling order for purposes of enforcement and modification of the child support obligation.  It remains in effect whether or not the parties remain in the state.  Since the controlling order is not always the original order, UIFSA provides guidance to “determine the controlling order (DCO)” when multiple orders exist.  For more information, please see Appendix 11.A – Determination of Controlling Order.   

Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction (CEJ)

In addition to the controlling order concept, UIFSA defined continuing exclusive jurisdiction.  A tribunal of a state retains sole authority to modify a support order issued by that tribunal as long as:  (a) One (1) of the parties of the order maintains residency in that state, or (b) Until all of the parties of the order have filed a written consent with the tribunal that issued the order to allow another state to modify the order and assume continuing exclusive jurisdiction over the order.  CEJ is the basis for the intergovernmental process that focuses on one-state jurisdiction (e.g. long-arm jurisdiction or direct wage withholding).  For more information, see 11.B – Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction Rules.

Intergovernmental Case Processing

Intergovernmental Case 

When Wyoming initiates a referral of a case to another state, the Wyoming Child Support Program (WCSP) becomes the Initiating State (aka Initiating Jurisdiction or Agency).  The IV-D agency in the other state becomes the Responding State (aka Responding Jurisdiction or Agency) in the intergovernmental case.

Communication

Child Support Enforcement Network (CSENet)

CSENet provides an automated standardized approach for state IV-D agencies to communicate with each other and process intergovernmental cases.  Through CSENet, case workers initiate and respond to intergovernmental requests to: 

This automated format of routine tasks within the child support program improved the efficiency of intergovernmental case processing.  

Note: When case workers work with other CSENet states, communication is conducted via CSENet.  If the other state is not a CSENet state, the case worker will send/receive requests via the mail and update POSSE with all information.  Wyoming is a CSENet state. See Appendix 11.E - CSENet States.

Other State

While many states communicate utilizing CSENet as discussed above, some states do not use CSENet.  Additionally, other circumstances may require direct contact with the case worker in the other state.  In order to communicate effectively with the other state, Wyoming case workers will use the federally mandated intergovernmental forms as described in the next section and in Appendix 11.C – Intergovernmental Forms, call the other state, fax requests to the other state, or if appropriate, e-mail the case worker in the other state.  

As discussed above, according to federal regulations, the WCSP has 10 business days to notify the other state of new information.  New information includes but is not limited to a(n): 

 Custodial Parent

A custodial parent involved in an intergovernmental case should receive all information about the child support case from the case worker in the Initiating State.  If Wyoming is the Initiating State, the case worker in Wyoming will provide the custodial parent with an update within 2 business days of receiving notices of pending or completed legal action.  Providing this update includes obtaining the signature of the custodial parent when necessary.

When Wyoming is the Responding State in an intergovernmental case, the Wyoming case worker is only required to keep the Initiating State informed of all case activity as required by federal regulations.  The Initiating State is required to communicate with the custodial parent.

While Wyoming is not required to provide information to the custodial parent when Wyoming is the Responding State, a Wyoming case worker will not refuse a phone call from the custodial parent.  The case worker will:

Standardized Forms

In addition to the verbatim enactment of UIFSA, PRWORA also required the use of standardized intergovernmental forms.  These forms consist of the following:

The federal Office of Child Services (OCSS) provides instructions on the use of each form and updates them on a regular basis.  Case workers will generate the federally mandated forms from POSSE.  See Appendix 11.C – Intergovernmental Forms for more information on the use of each form.

Federal Guidelines and Timeframes

In order to ensure the best possible service to the customers within the Wyoming CSE Program, the federal OCSE established certain minimum timeframes by which actions within the child support program should take place.  Below are the federal guidelines and timeframes for this chapter:

Intergovernmental   

General Intergovernmental Responsibilities:

Central Registry – When Wyoming Receives a Request for Locate Services from Another State:

Within 10 working days of receipt of an intergovernmental IV-D case, the Wyoming Central Registry shall:


Within 5 working days, the district office shall respond to an Initiating State’s request for case status.

Initiating – When Wyoming is the Initiating State:

Responding – When Wyoming is the Responding State:

 (45 CFR 303.7(d)(3))

(45 CFR 303.7(d)(5))

To comply with this federal regulation through self-assessment, a state shall meet this requirement for of all its open cases.  (45 CFR 305.63(c) and 45 CFR 308.2(g))  

In addition to the timeframes provided for intergovernmental cases, the Code of Federal Regulations also provides guidance surrounding cost recovery in intergovernmental cases.  Specifically, 

1) Except for those costs in paragraphs (2) and (3) below, the Responding State pays for the costs incurred in intergovernmental cases.

2) The Initiating State shall pay for the costs of genetic testing.  If the Responding State establishes paternity, the Responding State will request a judgment for genetic testing costs for the Initiating State and forward any costs recovered to the Initiating State.

3) Each State may recover its costs of providing services in intergovernmental non-public assistance cases.  (45 CFR 303.7(d))

To comply with this federal regulation through self-assessment, a state shall meet this requirement for seventy-five percent (75%) of all its open cases.  (45 CFR 305.63(c)(2), (3), (4), and (5) and 45 CFR 308.2(g))  

Closure

A IV-D child support case may be closed as long as it meets all of the requirements outlined in the federal regulations. (45 CFR 303.11)  The case closure criteria that may apply in intergovernmental cases are:

To comply with this federal regulation through self-assessment, a state shall meet this requirement for ninety percent (90%) of all its open cases. (45 CFR 305.63(b)(2) and 45 CFR 308.2(a))  

See Chapter 12 Closure for more details.

Note: Do not remove the intergovernmental information on a Case where Wyoming is the Responding State.   

Version Number:  4

Last Revised:  July 1, 2015

Last Reviewed: